Powered by our proprietary Conscious Writing™ methodology
We transform grant proposals into strategic funding instruments.
We examine not only what you say, but how it will be interpreted, scored, and ranked within the broader funding ecosystem.
We think like reviewers
We adopt the perspectives and review style of your evaluators, whether a:
- A panel of subject matter experts
- Criteria-based evaluators using scoring rubrics
- Mixed panels balancing technical review with programmatic alignment
We assess how your proposal will be read, interpreted, and scored under real review conditions, ensuring alignment with both explicit criteria and implicit expectations.
As reviewers, we assess your:
Institutional fit and strategic positioning
Grant proposals are rarely evaluated in isolation. They are reviewed within the broader context of a funder’s mission, priorities, and portfolio.
We assess:
1. Alignment with the grant-making funder’s institutional goals
2. Where this programme sits within the funder’s overall grant portfolio
3. The history of the grant programme and what the funder has funded previously
4. The likely priorities of decision-makers and evaluators
Depth of content and technical rigor
Through our Conscious Writing™ lens, we conduct a detailed analysis of:
1. Objective measurement of impact and outcomes: Are outcomes realistic, quantifiable, and evaluation-ready? Are your claims supported with clear examples and measurable commitments?
2. Feasibility: Is the project scope achievable within the proposed timeline and budget?
3. Use of relevant terminology and industry knowledge: Is the language accurate, current, and appropriately technical for the audience?
4. Language alignment: Does your proposal reflect the language the agency uses (i.e., technical, formal, creative, policy-driven, or research-focused)?
5. Audience alignment: Are reviewers likely to be subject matter experts or generalist evaluators? Is the complexity appropriately calibrated?
Compliance and technical requirements
We ensure strict adherence to:
1. Formatting requirements
2. Page limits and word counts
3. Submission specifications
4. Eligibility and qualification criteria
6. All stated and unstated compliance factors
Even strong proposals are rejected for noncompliance. We eliminate that risk.
The review process
We follow the Shipley Proposal Process, incorporating staged review cycles such as:
- Pink Team Reviews: Early-stage alignment and structure feedback
- Red Team Reviews: In-depth critical evaluation from a reviewer’s perspective
- Gold Team Reviews: Executive-level strategic positioning and polish
We can engage:
- Iteratively, reviewing responses section-by-section as you draft
- Or comprehensively, once the full proposal is complete
This way, we can work with you at any stage of development.
Our promise to you
We guarantee fast and discreet handling of all your grant reviews.
Our team of qualified grant writers is available day and night, because your satisfaction is our highest priority.
Transform your grant outcomes
If you want to secure grant funding, increase your chances of successful applications, or strengthen your grant-writing skills, our team is here to support you.
To find out more, arrange a consultation with one of our funding experts today.
Explore our grant support services to find out how we can help
Grant writing
Funder-focused grant writing powered by Conscious Writing™, turning strategy into persuasive, high-scoring applications.
Grant review
Conscious Writing™-led reviews expert reviews that strengthen initiatives, innovation, compliance and scoring.
Lifecycle management
Structured, stress-free application coordination that leverages Shipley principles for end-to-end management and delivery.
Strategy and governance
A retained, strategic partnership that strengthens grant performance through governance, resourcing, strategy and quality control across high-volume or business-critical opportunities.